APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR NOx SIGNAL CORRECTION IN FEEDBACK CONTROLS OF AN SCR SYSTEM

ABSTRACT

For example, according to one representative embodiment, an apparatus for reducing NO x  emissions in an engine exhaust includes a NO x  reduction target module configured to determine a NO x  reduction requirement. The apparatus also includes a tailpipe NO x  module configured to determine a sensed amount of NO x  exiting the engine system and a signal correction algorithm module configured to determine a corrected amount of NO x  exiting the engine system based at least partially on the sensed amount of NO x  exiting the engine system. The apparatus also includes a feedback ammonia target module configured to determine a feedback ammonia addition requirement. The feedback ammonia addition requirement includes an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO x  reduction requirement in response to the corrected amount of NO x  exiting the engine system. The apparatus also includes a reductant target module that is configured to determine a reductant injection requirement.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/120,319, filed Dec. 5, 2008, and is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/112,500, filed Apr. 30, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/112,622, filed Apr. 30, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/112,678, filed Apr. 30, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/112,795, filed Apr. 30, 2008. These applications are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

This disclosure relates to controlling nitrogen oxides (NO_(x)) emissions for internal combustion engines, and more particularly to apparatus, systems and methods for controlling NO_(x) with a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst.

BACKGROUND

Emissions regulations for internal combustion engines have become more stringent over recent years. The regulated emissions of NO_(x) and particulates from internal combustion engines are low enough that in many cases the emissions levels cannot be met with improved combustion technologies. Therefore, the use of aftertreatment systems on engines to reduce emissions is increasing. For reducing NO_(x) emissions, NO_(x) reduction catalysts, including selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, are utilized to convert NO_(x) (NO and NO₂ in some fraction) to N₂ and other compounds. SCR systems utilize a reductant, typically ammonia, to reduce the NO_(x). Currently available SCR systems can produce high NO_(x) conversion rates allowing the combustion technologies to focus on power and efficiency. However, currently available SCR systems also suffer from a few drawbacks.

SCR systems generate ammonia to reduce the NO_(x). When just the proper amount of ammonia is available at the SCR catalyst under the proper conditions, the ammonia is utilized to reduce NO_(x). However, if the reduction reaction rate is too slow, or if there is excess ammonia in the exhaust, ammonia can slip out the exhaust pipe. Ammonia is an extreme irritant and an undesirable emission. Accordingly, slips of even a few tens of ppm are problematic. Additionally, due to the undesirability of handling pure ammonia, many systems utilize an alternate compound such as urea, that vaporizes and decomposes to ammonia in the exhaust stream. Presently available SCR systems treat injected urea as injected ammonia, and do not account for the vaporization and hydrolysis of urea to component compounds such as ammonia and isocyanic acid. As a result, the urea can decompose to ammonia downstream of the SCR causing ammonia slip, and less ammonia may be available for NO_(x) reduction than the control mechanism estimates causing higher NO_(x) emissions at the tailpipe.

SCR systems that utilize urea dosing to generate ammonia depend upon the real-time delivery of urea to the SCR catalyst as engine NO_(x) emissions emerge. Urea dosers have relatively slow physical dynamics compared to other chemical injectors such as hydrocarbon injectors. Therefore, urea doser dynamics can substantially affect an SCR controls system.

Some currently available SCR systems account for the dynamics of the urea dosing and the generally fast transient nature of the internal combustion engine by utilizing the inherent ammonia storage capacity of many SCR catalyst formulations.

One currently available method introduces a time delay at the beginning of an engine NO_(x) spike before urea dosing begins (or ramps up), and a time delay after the NO_(x) spike before urea dosing ends (or ramps down). Ordinarily, an engine NO_(x) spike will cause a temperature increase in the exhaust gas and SCR catalyst, which may result in the release of stored ammonia on the catalyst. This is especially true when engine power output is used as a substitute for directly estimating engine NO_(x) emissions. The ammonia release provides ammonia for reducing engine out NO_(x) while delaying urea injection prevents excess ammonia from slipping out the exhaust. On the NO_(x) decrease, normally the temperature of the engine exhaust and SCR catalyst decrease, and therefore continued urea injection (the delay before ramping down urea injection) provides ammonia to store on the SCR catalyst and recharge the catalyst.

In many ordinary circumstances, the time delay method causes desirable results in the SCR catalyst. However, in some cases the time delay method can produce undesirable results and even responses that are opposite from an optimal response. For example, a decrease in EGR fraction for any reason causes an engine out NO_(x) spike with a decrease in exhaust temperature. In a time delay system utilizing engine-out power as a substitute for NO_(x) emissions, the change will likely be ignored and a standard amount of injected urea will cause an increase in NO_(x) emissions. In a time delay system that recognizes the engine out NO_(x) spike, the system delays injecting ammonia-creating urea. Because the temperature on the SCR catalyst is relatively lower, the amount of NO_(x)—reducing ammonia released from the catalyst is reduced, which results in a NO_(x) emissions increase. At the end of the NO_(x) spike event, the exhaust temperature increases (from restoration of the designed EGR fraction) while the NO_(x) emissions decreases. The SCR catalyst ejects ammonia from the reduced storage capacity while the urea injector continues to add ammonia to the system without NO_(x) available for reduction. Therefore, the system can slip significant amounts of ammonia on the down cycle.

Other currently available systems determine whether the SCR catalyst is at an ammonia storing (adsorption) or ammonia ejecting (desorption) temperature. When the SCR catalyst is storing ammonia, the system injects urea until the catalyst is full. When the SCR catalyst is ejecting ammonia, the system halts injection and allows stored ammonia to release and reduce NO_(x).

Presently available systems tracking the SCR catalyst temperature suffer from a few drawbacks. For example, the amount of ammonia stored on the SCR catalyst varies with temperature. However, presently available systems assume a storage amount below a specified temperature, and zero storage above the specified temperature. Therefore, the controls may toggle significantly around the specified temperature, significantly overestimate ammonia storage capacity just below the specified temperature, and significantly underestimate ammonia storage capacity just above the specified temperature. Such systems utilize the “normalized stoichiometric ratio” (NSR) to determine baseline urea injection, but do not account for variances in the NO_(x) composition and NH₃ to isocyanic acid ratio of the urea when determining the NSR. Further, such systems do not account for the incomplete vaporization and hydrolysis of urea that occurs in many systems and may therefore not inject sufficient urea to reduce NO_(x) and/or provide the desired ammonia for storage.

Also, many known SCR systems do not utilize an ammonia oxidation (AMOX) catalyst downstream of the SCR catalyst to convert at least some ammonia slipping from the SCR catalyst to N₂ and other less harmful compounds. For those conventional SCR systems that do employ an AMOX catalyst, the operating conditions and conversion capability of the AMOX catalyst are not factored into the reductant dosing rate, ammonia storage control, ammonia slippage control, and NO_(x) conversion efficiency feedback of such systems.

Ammonia slippage also poses a problem for NO_(x) sensor technology, which has been found to exhibit ammonia cross-sensitivity. Thus ammonia slippage could be erroneously interpreted as NO_(x) emission, thereby calling for increased reductant dosing via a feedback control loop. The resulting positive feedback in that case would have the undesirable effect of further increasing rather than decreasing the ammonia slippage.

SUMMARY

The subject matter of the present application has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available exhaust aftertreatment systems. Accordingly, the subject matter of the present application has been developed to provide apparatus, systems, and methods for reducing NO_(x) emissions on an SCR catalyst that overcomes at least some shortcomings of the prior art aftertreatment systems.

For example, according to one representative embodiment, an apparatus for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust includes a NO_(x) reduction target module that is configured to determine a NO_(x) reduction requirement. The NO_(x) reduction requirement includes an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. In some implementations, NO_(x) reduction requirement includes a fraction of the NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced to achieve a predetermined emissions limit. The apparatus also includes a tailpipe NO_(x) module configured to determine a sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system, and a signal correction algorithm module configured to determine a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system based at least partially on the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The apparatus also includes a feedback ammonia target module that is configured to determine a feedback ammonia addition requirement. The feedback ammonia addition requirement includes an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement in response to the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The apparatus also includes a reductant target module that is configured to determine a reductant injection requirement. The reductant injection requirement includes an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the ammonia addition requirement.

In some implementations, the signal correction algorithm module comprises an ammonia correction factor applied to the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system, either measured or analytically modeled, to compensate for ammonia cross-sensitivity of a measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system so as to yield the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. In a further embodiment, dithering may be performed to adjust the ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.

In some implementations, the apparatus further includes a feedforward ammonia target module configured to determine a feedforward ammonia addition requirement. The reductant injection requirement can include an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve a combination of the feedback and feedforward ammonia addition requirements.

The feedback ammonia addition requirement may be based at least partially on a comparison between a desired amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system and the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. In certain implementations, the apparatus can also include a calibrated NO_(x) module that is configured to determine a calibrated NO_(x) sensor signal based at least partially on input from a NO_(x) sensor and the condition of the NO_(x) sensor. The measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system can be interpreted from the calibrated NO_(x) sensor signal.

According to another embodiment, a method for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust includes determining a NO_(x) reduction requirement comprising an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. The method also includes determining a feedback ammonia addition requirement. The feedback ammonia addition requirement includes an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement in response to a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The method also includes determining the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The method further includes determining a reductant injection requirement. The reductant injection requirement can include an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the ammonia addition requirement.

In an embodiment, determining the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system may comprise applying an ammonia correction factor to the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system to compensate for ammonia cross-sensitivity of the measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. In a further embodiment, it may comprise performing dithering to adjust the ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.

In some implementations, determining an ammonia addition requirement includes comparing a desired amount of NO_(x) emissions exiting the engine system with a measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system.

According to another embodiment, a system for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust gas stream includes an internal combustion engine producing an exhaust gas stream, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst that reduces NO_(x) emissions in the exhaust gas stream in the presence of a reductant, a reductant injector that injects reductant into the exhaust gas stream upstream of the SCR catalyst, and a controller. The controller includes a NO_(x) reduction target module, a tailpipe NO_(x) module, a signal correction algorithm module, a feedback ammonia target module, and a reductant target module. The reduction target module can be configured to determine a NO_(x) reduction requirement that includes an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on the SCR catalyst. The feedback ammonia target module can be configured to determine a feedback ammonia addition requirement that includes an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement in response to a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The signal correction algorithm module can be configured to determine the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. The reductant target module can be configured to determine a reductant injection requirement that includes an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the ammonia addition requirement.

In some implementations, the signal correction algorithm module comprises an ammonia correction factor applied to the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system, either measured or analytically modeled, to compensate for ammonia cross-sensitivity of a measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system so as to yield the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system. In a further embodiment, dithering may be performed to adjust the ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.

In some implementations, the system also includes a NO_(x) sensor embedded within the SCR catalyst.

In an embodiment, a method for extracting a tailpipe NO_(x) measurement from a tailpipe NO_(x) signal transmitted from a tailpipe NO_(x) sensor having an ammonia cross-sensitivity includes determining an amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe, adjusting an ammonia correction factor periodically by dithering the amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe, multiplying the amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe by the ammonia correction factor to yield a product term, and subtracting the product term from the tailpipe NO_(x) signal to extract the tailpipe NO_(x) measurement.

Reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the subject matter of the present disclosure should be or are in any single embodiment. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.

Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the subject matter of the present disclosure may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize that the subject matter may be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments. These features and advantages will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the subject matter as set forth hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order that the advantages of the subject matter may be more readily understood, a more particular description of the subject matter briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the subject matter and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the subject matter will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an internal combustion engine having an exhaust after-treatment system according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the exhaust after-treatment system of FIG. 1 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of a controller of the exhaust after-treatment system of FIG. 2 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a NO_(x) reduction target module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 5A is a schematic block diagram of a feedforward ammonia target module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 5B is a schematic block diagram of a feedback ammonia target module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 5C is a graph illustrating ammonia cross-sensitivity of a NO_(x) sensor of the exhaust after-treatment system during steady-state operation of the internal combustion engine.

FIG. 5D is a graph illustrating ammonia cross-sensitivity of the NO_(x) sensor of the exhaust after-treatment system during a known operating mode of the internal combustion engine.

FIG. 5E is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating one embodiment of a signal correction algorithm of the feedback ammonia target module of FIG. 5B to correct the NO_(x) sensor signal.

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a reductant target module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of a reductant hydrolysis module of the reductant target module of FIG. 6 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of an inverse reductant hydrolysis module of the reductant target module of FIG. 6 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 9 is a schematic flow chart diagram of a control system operable to determine ammonia and isocyanic acid flow into an SCR catalyst according to one embodiment;

FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of an ammonia storage module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram of a current ammonia storage level module of the ammonia storage module of FIG. 10 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 12 is a schematic flow chart diagram of a control system operable to determine the storage level of ammonia on an SCR catalyst;

FIG. 13 is a schematic flow chart diagram of a control system operable to determine the amount of ammonia slip from an SCR catalyst;

FIG. 14 is a schematic block diagram of an AMOX catalyst ammonia conversion module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 15 is a schematic block diagram of a reductant limiting module of the controller of FIG. 3 according to one representative embodiment;

FIG. 16 is a schematic block diagram of a calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module of the reductant limiting module of FIG. 15 according to one representative embodiment; and

FIG. 17 is a method of reducing NO_(x) emissions using ammonia storage on an SCR catalyst.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Many of the functional units described in this specification have been labeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize their implementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.

Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions, which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.

Indeed, a module of executable code may be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.

Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the subject matter described herein may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of controls, structures, algorithms, programming, software modules, user selections, network transactions, database queries, database structures, hardware modules, hardware circuits, hardware chips, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the subject matter. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the subject matter may be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 1 depicts one embodiment of an internal combustion engine system 10. The main components of the engine system 10 include an internal combustion engine 11 and an exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 coupled to the engine. The internal combustion engine 11 can be a compression ignited internal combustion engine, such as a diesel fueled engine, or a spark-ignited internal combustion engine, such as a gasoline fueled engine operated lean. The engine system 10 further includes an air inlet 12, intake manifold 14, exhaust manifold 16, turbocharger turbine 18, turbocharger compressor 20, temperature sensors (e.g., temperature sensor 24), pressure sensors (e.g., pressure sensor 26), and air-flow sensor 56. The air inlet 12 is vented to the atmosphere and connected to an inlet of the intake manifold 14 to enable air to enter the intake manifold. The intake manifold 14 includes an outlet operatively coupled to compression chambers of the internal combustion engine 11 for introducing air into the compression chambers.

Within the internal combustion engine 11, the air from the atmosphere is combined with fuel to power the engine. Combustion of the fuel and air produces exhaust gas that is operatively vented to the exhaust manifold 16. From the exhaust manifold 16, a portion of the exhaust gas may be used to power the turbocharger turbine 18. The turbine 18 drives the turbocharger compressor 20, which may compress at least some of the air entering the air inlet 12 before directing it to the intake manifold 14 and into the compression chambers of the engine 11.

The exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 is coupled to the exhaust manifold 16 of the engine 11. At least a portion of the exhaust gas exiting the exhaust manifold 16 can pass through the exhaust after-treatment system 100. In certain implementations, the engine system 10 includes an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve (not shown) configured to open to allow a portion of the exhaust gas to recirculate back into the compression chambers for altering the combustion properties of the engine 11.

Generally, the exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 is configured to remove various chemical compound and particulate emissions present in the exhaust gas received from the exhaust manifold 16 and not recirculated back into the engine 11. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 includes controller 130, oxidation catalyst 140, particulate matter (PM) filter 142, SCR system 150 having an SCR catalyst 152, and ammonia oxidation (AMOX) catalyst 160. In an exhaust flow direction, indicated by directional arrow 144, exhaust may flow from the exhaust manifold 16, through the oxidation catalyst 140, through the particulate filter 142, through the SCR catalyst 152, through the AMOX catalyst 160, and then be expelled into the atmosphere. In other words, the particulate filter 142 is positioned downstream of the oxidation catalyst 140, the SCR catalyst 152 is positioned downstream of the particulate filter 142, and the AMOX catalyst 160 is positioned downstream of the SCR catalyst 152. Generally, exhaust gas treated in the exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 and released into the atmosphere consequently contains significantly fewer pollutants, such as diesel particulate matter, NO_(x), hydrocarbons, such as carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, than untreated exhaust gas.

The oxidation catalyst 140 can be any of various flow-through, diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC) known in the art. Generally, the oxidation catalyst 140 is configured to oxidize at least some particulate matter, e.g., the soluble organic fraction of soot, in the exhaust and reduce unburned hydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust to less environmentally harmful compounds. For example, the oxidation catalyst 140 may sufficiently reduce the hydrocarbon and CO concentrations in the exhaust to meet the requisite emissions standards.

The particulate filter 142 can be any of various particulate filters known in the art configured to reduce particulate matter concentrations, e.g., soot and ash, in the exhaust gas to meet requisite emission standards. The particulate filter 142 can be electrically coupled to a controller, such as controller 130, that controls various characteristics of the particulate filter, such as, for example, the timing and duration of filter regeneration events. In some implementations, the particulate filter 142 and associated control system is similar to, or the same as, the respective particulate filters and control systems described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/227,320; 11/227,403; 11/227,857; and 11/301,998, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The SCR system 150 includes a reductant delivery system 151 that includes a reductant source 170, pump 180 and delivery mechanism 190. The reductant source 170 can be a container or tank capable of retaining a reductant, such as, for example, ammonia (NH₃), urea, diesel fuel, or diesel oil. The reductant source 170 is in reductant supplying communication with the pump 180, which is configured to pump reductant from the reductant source to the delivery mechanism 190. The delivery mechanism 190 can include a reductant injector schematically shown at 192 positioned upstream of the SCR catalyst 152. The injector is selectively controllable to inject reductant directly into the exhaust gas stream prior to entering the SCR catalyst 152. In some embodiments, the reductant can either be ammonia or urea, which decomposes to produce ammonia. As will be described in more detail below, in these embodiments, the ammonia reacts with NO_(x) in the presence of the SCR catalyst 152 to reduce the NO_(x) to less harmful emissions, such as N₂ and H₂O. The SCR catalyst 152 can be any of various catalysts known in the art. For example, in some implementations, the SCR catalyst 152 is a vanadium-based catalyst, and in other implementations, the SCR catalyst is a zeolite-based catalyst, such as a Cu-Zeolite or a Fe-Zeolite catalyst. In one representative embodiment, the reductant is aqueous urea and the SCR catalyst 152 is a zeolite-based catalyst.

The AMOX catalyst 160 can be any of various flow-through catalysts configured to react with ammonia to produce mainly nitrogen. Generally, the AMOX catalyst 160 is utilized to remove ammonia that has slipped through or exited the SCR catalyst 152 without reacting with NO_(x) in the exhaust. In certain instances, the system 10 can be operable with or without an AMOX catalyst. Further, although the AMOX catalyst 160 is shown as a separate unit from the SCR catalyst 152, in some implementations, the AMOX catalyst can be integrated with the SCR catalyst, e.g., the AMOX catalyst and the SCR catalyst can be located within the same housing.

The exhaust after-treatment system 100 includes various sensors, such as temperature sensors 124A-F, pressure sensor 126, oxygen sensor 162, NO_(x) sensors 164A-D, NH₃ sensors 166A-C, dual ammonia/NO_(x) sensors (not shown) and the like, that are disposed throughout the exhaust gas after-treatment system. The various sensors may be in electrical communication with the controller 130 to monitor operating conditions and control the engine system 10, including the exhaust after-treatment system 100. In the illustrated embodiment, the exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 includes NO_(x) sensor 164A upstream of the oxidation catalyst 140, NO_(x) sensor 164B embedded within the SCR catalyst 152, NO_(x) sensor 164C intermediate the SCR catalyst and AMOX catalyst 160, and NO_(x) sensor 164D downstream of the AMOX catalyst. Further, the illustrated exhaust gas after-treatment system 100 includes NH₃ sensor 166A upstream of the SCR catalyst 125, NH₃ sensor 166B embedded within the SCR catalyst 152, and NH₃ sensor 166C downstream of the AMOX catalyst 160.

Although the exhaust after-treatment system 100 shown includes one of an oxidation catalyst 140, particulate filter 142, SCR catalyst 152, and AMOX catalyst 160 positioned in specific locations relative to each other along the exhaust flow path, in other embodiments, the exhaust after-treatment system may include more than one of any of the various catalysts positioned in any of various positions relative to each other along the exhaust flow path as desired. Further, although the oxidation catalyst 140 and AMOX catalyst 160 are non-selective catalysts, in some embodiments, the oxidation and AMOX catalysts can be selective catalysts.

The controller 130 controls the operation of the engine system 10 and associated sub-systems, such as the engine 11 and exhaust gas after-treatment system 100.

The controller 130 is depicted in FIG. 2 as a single physical unit, but can include two or more physically separated units or components in some embodiments if desired. Generally, the controller 130 receives multiple inputs, processes the inputs, and transmits multiple outputs. The multiple inputs may include sensed measurements from the sensors and various user inputs. The inputs are processed by the controller 130 using various algorithms, stored data, and other inputs to update the stored data and/or generate output values. The generated output values and/or commands are transmitted to other components of the controller and/or to one or more elements of the engine system 10 to control the system to achieve desired results, and more specifically, achieve desired exhaust gas emissions.

The controller 130 includes various modules for controlling the operation of the engine system 10. For example, the controller 130 includes one or more modules for controlling the operation of the particulate filter 142 as described above. The controller 130 also includes one or more modules for controlling the operation of the SCR system 150. The controller 130 further includes one or more modules for controlling the operation of the engine 11. Additionally, in the event the oxidation catalyst 140 and AMOX catalyst 160 are selectively controllable, the controller 130 can include one or more modules for controlling the operation of the respective oxidation and AMOX catalysts.

Referring to FIG. 3, and according to one embodiment, the controller 130 includes several modules for controlling operation of the SCR system 150 to provide efficient reduction of NO_(x) during transient and steady state operations, while reducing ammonia slip from the tailpipe. More specifically, the controller 130 includes a NO_(x) reduction target module 300, at least one ammonia target module (e.g., feedforward ammonia target module 310 and feedback ammonia target module 344) a reductant target module 330, an NH₃ storage module 350, an AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380, a reductant limiting module 390, and a calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397. Generally, the modules are independently and/or cooperatively operated to achieve optimal NO_(x) conversion efficiency on the SCR catalyst 152 while minimizing ammonia slip and urea consumption. The controller 130 is communicable in data receiving and/or transmitting communication with several sub-systems of the engine system 10, such as engine controls 167, PM filter system controls 168, and SCR system controls 169.

Referring to FIG. 4, the NO_(x) reduction target module 300 is operable to determine a NO_(x) reduction requirement 304. The NO_(x) reduction requirement 304 represents the amount of NO_(x) that should be reduced from the exhaust gas stream on the SCR catalyst 152 to achieve a predetermined exhaust gas emissions limit. In other words, the NO_(x) reduction target module 300 determines the NO_(x) reduction requirement 304 necessary to achieve the desired tailpipe NO_(x) level 306. The desired amount of NO_(x) at the tailpipe, e.g., desired tailpipe NO_(x) level 306 (see FIGS. 4 and 16), is representative of the amount of NO_(x) allowed to exit the tailpipe pursuant to regulated emissions standards.

Generally, the NO_(x) reduction requirement 304 is expressed as the fraction of the NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced. The NO_(x) reduction requirement can also be expressed in terms of a NO_(x) reduction rate or the rate at which NO_(x) should be reduced to achieve the predetermined exhaust gas emissions limit. In certain implementations, the NO_(x) reduction target module 300 is communicable in data receiving communication with the NO_(x) sensor 164A to determine the amount of NO_(x) present in the exhaust gas stream prior to entering the SCR catalyst 152. Alternatively, or additionally, in some implementations, the amount of NO_(x) present in the exhaust gas stream can be estimated via operation of an engine operating conditions module 302. The engine operating conditions module 302 compares the operating conditions of the engine 11 against a stored operating map containing predetermined exhaust NO_(x) levels for various operating conditions of the engine to determine an estimated amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream. The NO_(x) reduction target module 300 compares the actual or estimated amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream at the engine outlet to a desired level of NO_(x) 306 in the exhaust gas emitted from the tailpipe to determine the NO_(x) reduction requirement 304.

The controller 130 includes an ammonia target module operable to determine an ammonia addition requirement. As defined herein, the ammonia addition requirement is the amount of ammonia that should be added to the exhaust gas stream to reduce the NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to the desired level for meeting the emissions standards. In certain embodiments, the controller 130 includes the feedforward ammonia target module 310 for determining an ammonia addition requirement 326 using a feedforward methodology (see FIG. 5A). In other embodiments, the controller 130 includes the feedback ammonia target module 344 for determining an ammonia addition requirement 348 using a feedback methodology (see FIG. 5B). In yet some embodiments, the controller 130 includes both the feedforward ammonia target module 310 and the feedback ammonia target module 344.

Referring first to FIG. 5A, the feedforward ammonia target module 310 receives as input the NO_(x) reduction requirement 304 from the NO_(x) reduction target module 311 (see FIG. 4), an NH₃ storage modifier 352 from the NH₃ storage module 350 (see FIG. 10), and a current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 from the reductant hydrolysis module 333 (see FIG. 7) and utilized by the module 310 to determine the ammonia addition requirement 326. In the representative illustrated embodiment, the feedforward ammonia target module 310 includes a NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312, an SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 314, an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316, an SCR catalyst bed temperature module 318, an SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) module 320, an SCR catalyst space velocity module 322, and a NO_(x) reduction reaction rate module 324.

The NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 is operable to determine the maximum efficiency of NO_(x) reduction on the SCR catalyst 152. Generally, the NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 considers a desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency and the condition of the SCR catalyst.

The desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency can be any of various efficiencies and be dependent on the difference between the amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream at the engine outlet with the desired amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream at the tailpipe outlet. For example, in some implementations, the desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency of the SCR catalyst 152 can be the efficiency necessary for achieving the desired tailpipe NO_(x) level 306 at the SCR catalyst outlet. However, in embodiments having an AMOX catalyst, the desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency of the SCR catalyst 152 can be lower than if no AMOX catalyst is being used because the AMOX catalyst can reduce ammonia slipping from the SCR catalyst.

The condition of the SCR catalyst 152 affects the efficiency of the SCR catalyst. The more degraded the condition of the SCR catalyst, the lower the maximum efficiency of NO_(x) reduction on the SCR catalyst 152. Accordingly, the NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 is operable to compare the desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency with the maximum NO_(x) conversion efficiency of the SCR catalyst 152 and output the smaller of the two efficiencies to the feedforward ammonia target module 310. The feedforward ammonia target module 310 then utilizes the smaller of the desired and maximum NO_(x) conversion efficiencies determined by the NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 to determine the ammonia addition requirement 326. Generally, the lower the smaller NOx conversion efficiency, the lower the ammonia addition requirement 326.

The NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 can determine the maximum NO_(x) conversion efficiency of the SCR catalyst 152 in various ways, such as described in pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/120,297, filed Dec. 5, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, the condition of the SCR catalyst 152 can be indicated by an SCR catalyst degradation factor. The SCR catalyst degradation factor can be determined by an SCR catalyst degradation factor module, such as module 368 described below in relation to FIG. 11, according to any of various ways. For example, the SCR catalyst degradation factor module can determine the SCR catalyst degradation factor in a manner similar to that described in pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/120,283, filed Dec. 5, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 314 is operable to predict the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio of the exhaust gas in the exhaust gas stream at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152. In some implementations, the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio is expressed as the following ratio:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{{NO}_{2}}{{NO} + {NO}_{2}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where NO is the mass concentration of nitrogen monoxide in a predetermined volume of exhaust gas and NO₂ is the mass concentration of nitrogen dioxide in the predetermined volume of exhaust gas.

The SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316 is operable to determine various properties of the exhaust gas at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152. The properties can include, for example, the mass flow rate of the exhaust and the temperature of the exhaust. In some implementations, the exhaust gas properties are predicted based on predetermined exhaust property values for predetermined operating conditions of the engine system 10. For example, the SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316 can include an exhaust properties map, table or vector comparing predetermined exhaust property values with engine system operating conditions, such as the operating load and/or speed of the engine 11. In certain implementations, the SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316 determines the exhaust gas properties by processing input from any of various sensors known in the art, such as mass flow and temperatures sensors.

The SCR catalyst bed temperature module 318 is operable to determine the bed temperature of the SCR catalyst 152. The bed temperature of the SCR catalyst 152 can be determined based on one or more temperature sensors embedded in the SCR catalyst, such as temperature sensor 124D, or predicted by a module (see, e.g., AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386 of FIG. 13) that uses various operating parameters of the system, such as the exhaust gas mass flow rate and temperature before and after the SCR catalyst 152. Accordingly, although the illustrated embodiments use an SCR catalyst bed temperature sensor 124D for determining the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed, in other embodiments, the sensor is replaced or supplemented with an SCR catalyst bed temperature module operable to predict or estimate the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed.

The SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) module 320 is operable to determine the concentration of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152. The NO_(x) concentration can be predicted based on predetermined exhaust conditions corresponding to predetermined operating conditions of the engine system 10. For example, the module 320 can access an exhaust properties map, table or vector such as described above to estimate the NO_(x) concentration in the exhaust. Alternatively, or additionally, the concentration of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas upon entering the SCR catalyst 152 can be measured using the first NO_(x) sensor 164A positioned upstream of the SCR catalyst.

The SCR catalyst space velocity module 322 is operable to determine the space velocity of the SCR catalyst 152. Generally, the space velocity of the SCR catalyst 152 represents the amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream that is reactable within the SCR catalyst over a given time. Accordingly, the space velocity of the SCR catalyst 152 typically is represented in terms of per unit time, e.g., 1/hour, 1,000/hour, etc. The space velocity of the SCR catalyst 152 is based on various exhaust gas and catalyst conditions. For example, the space velocity can be based at least partially on the volume and/or reaction, or bed, surface area of the SCR catalyst, and the density, viscosity and/or flow rate of the exhaust gas. In some implementations, the SCR catalyst space velocity module 322 determines the space velocity of the SCR catalyst 152 by receiving inputs concerning operating conditions of the engine system 10, and, based on the operation conditions, obtaining the space velocity of the SCR for the given conditions by accessing a table or map stored on the module. The table can include various predetermined space velocities obtained via experimental testing and calibration for a given SCR catalyst operating under the various operating conditions achievable by the engine system 10.

The NO_(x) reduction reaction rate module 324 is operable to predict the rate at which ammonia reacts with and reduces NO_(x) on the SCR catalyst 152. The predicted NO_(x) reaction rate is at least partially dependent on the NO_(x) composition or concentration of the exhaust gas and the frequency of the various types of NO_(x) reduction reactions occurring on the SCR catalyst 152. Generally, NO_(x) is reduced by ammonia in one of the following three most active stoichiometric chemical reactions:

$\begin{matrix} \left. {{NH}_{3} + {\frac{1}{2}{NO}} + {\frac{1}{2}{NO}_{2}}}\rightarrow{N_{2} + {\frac{3}{2}H_{2}O}} \right. & (2) \\ \left. {{NH}_{3} + {NO} + {\frac{1}{4}O_{2}}}\rightarrow{N_{2} + {\frac{3}{2}H_{2}O}} \right. & (3) \\ \left. {{NH}_{3} + {\frac{3}{4}{NO}_{2}}}\rightarrow{{\frac{7}{8}N_{2}} + {\frac{3}{2}H_{2}O}} \right. & (4) \end{matrix}$

The predicted NO_(x) reaction rate is also at least partially dependent on the ammonia concentration rate, the bed temperature of the SCR catalyst 152, and the space velocity of the SCR catalyst. Further, in some implementations, the predicted NO_(x) reaction rate is also at least partially dependent on the degradation factor or condition of the SCR catalyst 152. The predicted NO_(x) reaction rate can be expressed as the sum of a predicted NO_(x) reaction rate for reducing NO according to Equations 2 and 3 above and a predicted NO_(x) reaction rate for reducing NO₂ according to Equations 3 and 4 above.

Based at least partially on the desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency, the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio of the exhaust gas, the exhaust flow rate, the temperature and condition of the SCR catalyst 152 bed, the amount of NO_(x) and NH₃ at the inlet of the SCR catalyst, and the NO_(x) reduction reaction rate, the ammonia target module determines the ammonia addition requirement 326. In some embodiments, the ammonia addition requirement 326 is also at least partially based on an NH₃ storage modifier 352 determined by an NH₃ storage module 350 as will be described in more detail below (see FIG. 7).

According to another embodiment shown in FIG. 5B, the ammonia addition requirement, e.g., ammonia addition requirement 348, can be determined by the feedback ammonia target module 344. The feedback ammonia target module 344 receives as input the desired tailpipe NO_(x) level 306, the amount of NH₃ exiting the tailpipe as sensed by the tailpipe NH₃ sensor 166C, the NH₃ storage modifier 352, and a calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399 (see FIG. 16). Further, the feedback ammonia target module 344 includes an exhaust flow properties module 345 and a tailpipe NO_(x) feedback module 347. In contrast to the feedforward ammonia target module 310, the feedback ammonia target module 344 relies mainly on the properties of the exhaust gas stream after passing through the SCR catalyst 152 and adjusts the reductant dosing rate to compensate for errors and inconsistencies in the SCR system 150.

The exhaust flow properties module 345 is operable to determine various conditions of the exhaust gas stream, e.g., temperature, flow rate, etc., in a manner similar to that described above in relation to SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316.

The tailpipe NO_(x) feedback module 347 is operable to determine a tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value that can be utilized by the feedback ammonia target module 344 for determining the ammonia addition requirement 348. The tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value accounts for inconsistencies in the SCR system 150, such as modeling errors, catalyst aging, sensor aging, reductant concentration variations, reductant injector delays, which can reduce the efficiency of the system. Therefore, the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback module 396 is operable to modulate the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value to increase the efficiency of the SCR system 150 and achieve the desired NO_(x) conversion efficiency despite inconsistencies that may be present in the system.

The tailpipe NO_(x) feedback module 347 generates the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value by comparing the sensed amount of NO_(x) as detected by the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor 164D with the desired or targeted tailpipe NO_(x) amount 306. Accordingly, the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value is at least partially dependent on the difference between the sensed tailpipe NO_(x) and the targeted or desired tailpipe NO_(x) 306. Generally, the greater the difference between the sensed tailpipe NO_(x) and the targeted tailpipe NO_(x) 306, the higher the ammonia addition requirement 348. For example, if the sensed amount of tailpipe NO_(x) is relatively high compared to the targeted tailpipe NO_(x) 306, then the feedback ammonia target module 344 can increase the ammonia addition requirement 348. As will be explained in more detail below, an increase in the ammonia addition requirement 348 can result in more reductant being added to the exhaust gas stream for increased NO_(x) conversion on the SCR catalyst 152. Conversely, if the sensed amount of tailpipe NO_(x) is relatively low compared to the targeted tailpipe NO_(x) 306, then the feedback ammonia target module 344 can decrease the ammonia addition requirement, which may consequently result in less reductant being added to the exhaust gas stream to conserve reductant, and thus increase the efficiency of the SCR system 150.

In certain embodiments, because of the cross-sensitivity of some NO_(x) sensors to ammonia, the feedback ammonia target module 344 is utilized by the SCR system 150 to generate the ammonia addition requirement only when ammonia is not slipping from the SCR system 150, e.g., slipping out of the tailpipe. Whether ammonia is slipping from the tailpipe can be sensed by the tailpipe NH₃ sensor 166C and/or predicted by the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380, as will be described in more detail below.

In certain embodiments, the controller 130 includes a control logic selection algorithm (not shown) configured to select one of the ammonia addition requirements 326, 348 to act as the ammonia addition requirement for the SCR system 150 based at least partially on whether NH₃ is slipping from the tailpipe. In other words, the module used for determining the ammonia addition requirement for the SCR system 150 is switchable based on whether the SCR system is operating in a tailpipe NH₃ slip mode or a tailpipe NH₃ non-slip mode. More specifically, when NH₃ is slipping from the tailpipe, the ammonia addition requirement 326 determined by the feedforward ammonia target module 310 is communicated to the reductant target module 330 and used in the determination of the reductant injection requirement 332 (see FIG. 8). Conversely, when NH₃ is not slipping from the tailpipe, the ammonia addition requirement 348 determined by the feedback ammonia target module 344 is communicated to the reductant target module 330 and used in the determination of the reductant injection requirement 332. In some implementations, the control logic selection algorithm of the controller 130 determines the ammonia addition requirement based on a combination, e.g., an average, of the ammonia addition requirements 326, 348 regardless of whether ammonia is slipping from the tailpipe. In certain implementations, the ammonia addition requirement 326 can be adjusted according to the ammonia addition requirement 348.

In some embodiments, the feedback ammonia target module 344 includes a signal correction algorithm module 351 comprising an ammonia correction feature yielding a more accurate NO_(x) concentration at the tailpipe when ammonia is slipping from the tailpipe, as a function of the signal from the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor 164D, the amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe, and an ammonia correction factor. Accordingly, in some implementations, the ammonia addition requirement 348 generated by the feedback ammonia target module 344 can be communicated to the reductant target module 330 during operation in the tailpipe NH₃ slip or non-slip mode.

FIG. 5C is a graph illustrating ammonia cross-sensitivity of the NO_(x) sensor 164D during steady-state operation of engine 11 over a period of 30 minutes according to one exemplary embodiment. The urea dosing rate 202 is graphed relative to the right vertical axis in ml/hr. An ammonia slip signal 204 as received from NH₃ sensor 166C, and a plurality of NO_(x) measurement signals (e.g. FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 206 as received from an external FTIR monitoring device not subject to ammonia cross-sensitivity, SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) signal 208 as received from built-in NO_(x) sensor 164B, and SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210 as received from built-in NO_(x) sensor 164D) are graphed relative to the left vertical axis in ppm. Three consecutive phases of operation are shown, including phase A for six minutes, phase B for 10 minutes, and phase C for 14 minutes.

In phase A the urea dosing rate 202A is zero. As a result, no NO_(x) reduction is taking place, and thus the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210A is equal to the SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) signal 208A. Furthermore, because there is no ammonia slip 204A, the FTIR SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 206A is in close agreement with the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210A.

In phase B the urea dosing rate 202B is increased several fold above the stoichiometric level, thereby assuring substantial ammonia slip 204B, as well as complete NO_(x) reduction as indicated by the FTIR SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 206B going to zero. As a result, the non-zero SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210B becomes solely indicative of the ammonia cross-sensitivity of the NO_(x) sensor 164D, after a brief downward spike due to initial ammonia storage by the catalyst, and a time lag between SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210B and ammonia slip 204B due to differing time constants associated with NO_(x) sensor 164D and NH₃ sensor 166C respectively. With the signals thus stabilized, the ammonia correction factor may then be determined from the ratio of the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210B to the ammonia slip 204B. The SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) signal 208B continues to remain constant, since it is upstream of the SCR catalyst 152 and the engine 11 is in steady-state operation.

In phase C the urea dosing rate 202C returns to zero. As in phase A, the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210C becomes equal to the SCR catalyst inlet NO_(x) signal 208C, which continues to remain constant as in phase B. Furthermore, because there is no ammonia slip 204C, the FTIR SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 206C is once again in close agreement with the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210C. Note that the time lag between SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 210C and ammonia slip 204C is due to differing time constants associated respectively with NO_(x) sensor 164D and NH₃ sensor 166C.

FIG. 5D is a graph illustrating ammonia cross-sensitivity of the NO_(x) sensor 164D during a typical transient cycle of the engine system 10 over a period of 1200 seconds (20 minutes). An ammonia slip signal 222 is received from NH₃ sensor 166C, and a plurality of NO_(x) measurement signals are received, including FTIR SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 224 and CVS (Constant Volume Sampling) SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signal 226 from external monitoring devices not subject to ammonia cross-sensitivity, and SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 228 and 230 generated from respective built-in NO_(x) sensors 164D. In the illustrated embodiment, the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 228 and 230 are generated from respective NO_(x) sensors manufactured by different suppliers. Two consecutive phases of operation are shown, including phase A for six minutes, and phase B for 6 minutes.

In phase A, the ammonia slip 222A is at or near zero. As a result, the FTIR and CVS SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 224A and 226A remain in close agreement with the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 228A and 230A, nearly obscuring each other on the graph.

In phase B, the ammonia slip 222B varies significantly over time. As a result, the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 228B and 230B, while remaining in close agreement with each other, are noticeably higher than FTIR and CVS SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 224B and 226B, which are likewise in close agreement with each other. As before, the difference is indicative of ammonia cross-sensitivity, which permits the determination of an ammonia correction factor.

The ammonia correction factor, based on ammonia slip 222, may be applied to SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 228 and 230, thereby bringing them into closer agreement with the more accurate SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) signals 224 and 226. This mathematical correlation, while visually discernable to some extent in the transient graph of FIG. 5D, is not as clearly evident as in the steady-state graph of FIG. 5C, although the former is more typical of engine system 10 operation.

In a further embodiment, the accuracy of the signal correction algorithm 351 during typical operation of engine system 10 may be improved by the inclusion of a dithering feature. In one embodiment, this may be accomplished by periodically modulating the urea dosing command when a known system operating mode is reached and comparing the output of the NO_(x) sensor 164D with an estimate from an embedded model to determine the ammonia cross-sensitivity and adjust the ammonia correction factor accordingly.

FIG. 5E is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating one embodiment of a signal correction algorithm 351. The algorithm 351 starts 242 by sampling 244 the tailpipe NO_(x) signal from the NO_(x) sensor 164D. Sampling 244 the NO_(x) signal includes taking a sample of the tailpipe NO_(x) signal from the NO_(x) sensor 164D. The algorithm 351 proceeds to sample 246 the tailpipe NH₃ signal from the tailpipe NH₃ sensor 166C. Sampling 246 the tailpipe NH₃ signal includes taking a sample of the NH₃ signal from the tailpipe NH₃ sensor 166C. In another embodiment, the tailpipe NH₃ signal may be predicted by the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380.

The algorithm 351 continues by determining 248 whether the aftertreatement exhaust system 100 is in a slip mode. If the tailpipe NH₃ signal, whether sensed or predicted, is non-zero, the system 100 is in slip mode and the algorithm proceeds to determine 250 an ammonia correction factor, multiply 252 the tailpipe NH₃ signal by the determined ammonia correction factor, and subtract 254 the multiplied tailpipe NH₃ signal from the tailpipe NO_(x) signal to yield a corrected NO_(x) signal.

If slip mode is not indicated at event 248, and the algorithm determines 256 that the system 100 is in a known operating mode, meaning a set of operating conditions that are known by virtue of having been previously measured and/or analytically modeled for use by algorithm 351, then urea dosing is modulated 258 for a short interval to create a known amount of ammonia slip. The tailpipe NO_(x) signal from the NO_(x) sensor 164D is again sampled 260, and compared 262 with an estimate from an embedded model. The ammonia correction factor is then adjusted 264 as necessary to account for any discrepancy between the estimate and the tailpipe NO_(x) signal.

If a known operating mode is not indicated at event 256 and slip mode is not indicated at event 248, then the NO_(x) signal is passed through without correction and the ammonia correction factor is passed through without adjustment, by proceeding directly to event 266. At event 266, it is determined whether operation of the algorithm 351 should continue. If determined at event 266 that operation should continue, then the algorithm 351 returns to event 244 and the foregoing events are repeated. If determined at event 266 that operation is not to continue, then the method 351 ends 268.

As described above, the controller 130 can utilize the feedforward ammonia target module 310, the feedback ammonia target module 344, or both to determine an ammonia addition requirement for the SCR system 150. Once determined, the ammonia addition requirement, e.g., ammonia addition requirement 326, ammonia addition requirement 348, or combination of both, is communicated to the reductant target module 330, or more specifically, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 of the reductant target module. As used hereafter, the ammonia addition requirement communicated to the reductant target module 330 will be referenced as the ammonia addition requirement 326. Nevertheless, it is recognized that any reference to the ammonia addition requirement 326 can be substituted with the ammonia addition requirement 348 or a combination of the ammonia addition requirements 326, 348.

Referring to FIG. 6, the reductant target module 330 includes a reductant hydrolysis module 333 and an inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334. As will be described in more detail below, the reductant hydrolysis module 333 is operable to determine a current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 and a current SCR catalyst inlet HNCO flow rate 336 based on the current reductant dosing rate (see FIG. 7). The current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 and current SCR catalyst inlet HNCO flow rate 336 are then communicated to other various modules of the control system 150. In contrast to the reductant hydrolysis module 333, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 is operable to receive the ammonia addition requirement 326 from the ammonia target module 310 and determine a reductant injection requirement or dosing rate 332, i.e., the amount of reductant necessary to achieve the ammonia addition requirement 326 (see FIG. 8). Based on the reductant injection requirement 332, the controller 130 commands the SCR system controls to inject an amount of reductant corresponding to the reductant injection requirement 332. In some embodiments, the reductant injection requirement is modified as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/120,304, filed Dec. 5, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The reductant can be any of various reductants known in the art. For example, in one implementation, the reductant is ammonia. In other implementations, the reductant is urea, which breaks down into ammonia and other components as will be described in more detail below.

Referring back to FIG. 7, the reductant hydrolysis module 333 includes an NH₃ conversion efficiency table 337, an isocyanic acid (HNCO) conversion efficiency table 338, and an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 339. The SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 339 is operable to determine the mass flow rate of the exhaust gas stream in a manner similar to that described above in relation to SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316 of FIG. 5. The reductant hydrolysis module 333 is communicable in data receiving communication with the reductant delivery mechanism 190 for receiving a current reductant dosing rate 383 and the exhaust temperature sensor 124B for receiving the temperature of the exhaust.

As described above, in implementations where the reductant is urea, the reductant hydrolysis module 333 is operable to determine the amount of ammonia and isocyanic acid entering the SCR catalyst 152. According to one embodiment, the reductant hydrolysis module 333 is operable to follow the schematic flow chart 400 of FIG. 9 to determine the current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ and HNCO flow rates 335, 336, respectively. The exhaust temperature is sensed, such as by the temperature sensor 124B, or estimated, at 410 and the exhaust mass flow rate is estimated by the SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 339 at 420. Based at least partially on the exhaust temperature determined at 410 and the exhaust mass flow rate determined at 420, the conversion efficiency of urea to NH₃ is determined at 430 and the conversion efficiency of urea to isocyanic acid (HNCO) is determined at 440. Accordingly, the conversion efficiencies of urea to NH₃ and isocyanic acid are a function of the exhaust gas temperature and mass flow rate. The NH₃ and HNCO conversion efficiencies are determined by comparing the exhaust gas temperature and mass flow rate to one or more predetermined efficiency values listed on NH₃ and HNCO conversion efficiency look-up tables 337, 338, respectively.

According to the reductant injection requirement 332 received by the SCR inlet ammonia and isocyanic acid module 360 from the reductant target module 330, urea is injected into the exhaust gas stream by a urea injector at 450. The urea is mixed with the exhaust gas stream flowing through an exhaust pipe between the urea injector and the surface of SCR catalyst 152. As the urea flows along the exhaust pipe, it reacts with the exhaust gas to form NH₃ at 460 and HNCO at 470. The NH₃ and HNCO in the exhaust gas stream then enter the SCR catalyst 152 as the current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 and current SCR catalyst inlet HNCO flow rate 336, respectively. After the HNCO enters the SCR catalyst 152, the catalyst bed promotes a reaction between at least a portion of the HNCO and water (H₂O) in the exhaust gas stream to form additional NH₃ at 480. The current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 and the current HNCO to NH₃ flow rate 341, i.e., the NH₃ from the conversion of HNCO to NH₃ occurring within the SCR catalyst 152 at 480, are combined to provide an estimation of the total amount of ammonia within the SCR catalyst, e.g., the current SCR catalyst NH₃ flow rate 343. The estimated amount of HNCO that is not converted to NH₃ at 480 flows through and out of the SCR catalyst 152 at an SCR catalyst outlet HNCO flow rate 349.

As discussed above, the amount of urea converted to NH₃ is at least partially dependent on the NH₃ conversion efficiency. In an ideal situation, the NH₃ conversion efficiency is 100% such that the all the urea converts to 2-parts ammonia and 1-part carbon dioxide without any intermediate conversion to HNCO according to the following equation:

NH₂—CO—NH₂(aq)+H₂O→2NH₃(g)+CO₂  (5)

In actuality, the NH₃ conversion efficiency is typically less than 100% such that the urea converts to ammonia and isocyanic acid according to the following equation:

NH₂—CO—NH₂(s)→NH₃(g)+HNCO(g)  (6)

The remaining isocyanic acid converts to ammonia and carbon dioxide CO₂ according to the HNCO conversion efficiency. In ideal situations, the HNCO conversion efficiency is 100% such that all the isocyanic acid converts to 1-part ammonia and 1-part carbon dioxide within the SCR catalyst 152 according to the following equation:

HNCO(g)+H₂O(g)→NH₃(g)+CO₂(g)  (7)

Typically, however, the HNCO conversion efficiency is less than 100% such that some of the HNCO is converted to ammonia and carbon dioxide and the remaining portion of HNCO is unconverted within the SCR catalyst 152.

The flow rate of NH₃ into the SCR catalyst 152 ({dot over (n)}_(NH) ₃ (s)) per flow rate of injected urea ({dot over (n)}_(urea)(s)) is estimated according to the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{\overset{.}{n}}_{{NH}_{3}}(s)}{{\overset{.}{n}}_{urea}(s)} = {\frac{1}{{\tau \; s} + 1}\left( {1 - ^{{- x}/L}} \right){\eta_{{NH}_{3}}\left( {\overset{.}{m},T} \right)}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

where τ is the mixing time constant, s is a complex variable used for Laplace transforms, L is the characteristic mixing length, x is the distance from the urea injector to the SCR catalyst inlet or face, and η_(NH) ₃ is the NH₃ conversion efficiency from urea, which is based on the mass flow rate ({dot over (m)}) and temperature (T) of the exhaust gas. The complex variable s can be expressed as σ+jω, where σ represents the amplitude and ω represents the frequency of a sinusoidal wave associated with a given urea dosing rate input. The mixing time constant is predetermined based at least partially on the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) heavy-duty transient cycle for emission testing of heavy-duty on-road engines. Assuming 100% conversion efficiency, the mixing time constant is tuned with the FTP data to eliminate transient mismatches. The characteristic length L is defined as the major linear dimension of the exhaust pipe that is substantially perpendicular to the exhaust gas flow. For example, for a cylindrical exhaust pipe, the major linear dimension is the diameter of the pipe. In some embodiments, the distance from the urea injector to the SCR catalyst face x is between about 5 and 15 times the characteristic length. In specific implementations, the distance x is about 10 times the characteristic length.

Similarly, the flow rate of isocyanic acid (HNCO) into the SCR catalyst 152 ({dot over (n)}_(HNCO)(s)) per flow rate of injected urea ({dot over (n)}_(urea)(s)) is estimated according to the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{\overset{.}{n}}_{HNCO}(s)}{{\overset{.}{n}}_{urea}(s)} = {\frac{1}{{\tau \; s} + 1}\left( {1 - ^{{- x}/L}} \right){\eta_{HNCO}\left( {\overset{.}{m},T} \right)}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

where η_(HNCO) is the HNCO conversion efficiency from urea. The conversion efficiencies of urea to ammonia (η_(NH) ₃ ) and urea to isocyanic acid (η_(HNCO)) is predetermined based on operating parameters of the engine system 10. In some implementations, the conversion efficiencies are tuned by comparing a measurement of the NH₃ and HNCO at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152 with the expected amount of NH₃ and HNCO based on the stoichiometric reaction of Equation 6 while dosing urea into exhaust at specific mass flow rates and temperatures.

Referring now to FIG. 8, based at least partially on the ammonia addition requirement 326 received from the ammonia target module 310, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 of the reductant target module 330 is operable to determine the reductant injection requirement 332 to achieve the ammonia addition requirement 326 generated by the ammonia target module 310. In some implementations, the process used by the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 to determine the reductant injection requirement 332 is similar to the process illustrated in flow chart 400, but inverted. In other words, the same techniques used in flow chart 400 to determine the current SCR catalyst inlet NH₃ flow rate 335 can be used to determine the reductant injection requirement 332, but in a different order.

For example, in the flow chart 400, the actual urea dosing rate is known and used to determine the flow of NH₃ into the SCR catalyst 152. In contrast, in the process used by the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334, the ammonia addition requirement 326, e.g., the desired or estimated flow of NH₃ into the SCR catalyst 152, is known and used to determine the corresponding reductant injection requirement, e.g., dosing rate, necessary to achieve the desired NH₃ flow rate. The reductant injection requirement 332 is determined by predicting the hydrolysis rates and conversion efficiencies of urea to NH₃ and HNCO based on the temperature and mass flow rate of the exhaust gas stream. For example, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 can include an NH₃ conversion efficiency table, HNCO conversion efficiency table, and an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module similar to the reductant hydrolysis module 333. Alternatively, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 can access the NH₃ conversion efficiency table 337, HNCO conversion efficiency table 338, and output of the SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 339 of the reductant hydrolysis module 333.

In some implementations, with the desired flow rate of NH₃ into the SCR catalyst 152 ({dot over (n)}_(NH) ₃ (s)), e.g., the ammonia addition requirement, known, the reductant injection requirement 332 is determined from Equation 8 above by solving for the flow rate of injected urea {dot over (n)}_(urea)(s). In one specific implementation, the reduction injection requirement 332 expressed in terms of mL/hr of urea is approximately equal to:

$\begin{matrix} {{\frac{mL}{hr}{Urea}} \approx {1.85*{f(a)}*\overset{.}{m}\; {NO}_{x}}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

where {dot over (m)}NO_(x) is equal to the mass flow rate of the total amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream expressed in terms of grams/hour and f(a) is a non-dimensional piecewise function where a is equal to the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio expressed above in Equation 1. When NO is greater than or equal to NO₂, i.e., NO₂/NO_(x)≦0.5,f(a) is equal to about one, and when NO is less than or equal to NO₂, i.e., NO₂/NO_(x)≧0.5f(a) is equal to:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{2\left( {a + 1} \right)}{3} & (11) \end{matrix}$

In another specific embodiment, the reduction injection requirement 332 is determined based on the ideal stoichiometric conversion of urea to ammonia and the ideal stoichiometric reduction of NO_(x) on the SCR catalyst 152. When the level of NO in the exhaust gas stream is greater than or equal to the level of NO₂ in the exhaust gas, the amount of urea for reducing one gram of NO_(x) is represented by Equation 12 below. When the level of NO in the exhaust gas is less than or equal to the level of NO₂ in the exhaust gas, the amount of urea for reducing one gram of NO_(x) is represented by Equation 13 below, where a is equal to the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio expressed above in Equation 1. As used in Equations 12 and 13, MW_(Urea) is the molecular weight of the urea to be injected and MW_(NOx) is the molecular weight of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream.

$\begin{matrix} {0.5*\left( \frac{M\; W_{Urea}}{M\; W_{NOx}} \right)} & (12) \\ {0.5*\left( \frac{M\; W_{Urea}}{M\; W_{NOx}} \right)*\frac{2\left( {a + 1} \right)}{3}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

Based on Equations 12 and 13, the flow rate of urea in terms of grams per second can be expressed in terms of the mass flow rate of NO_(x)({dot over (m)}_(NOx)) in the exhaust gas stream. For example, when the amount of NO in the exhaust gas stream is more than or equal to the amount of NO₂ in the exhaust gas stream, the flow rate of urea can be expressed according to the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{{\overset{.}{m}}_{NOx}}{0.5*\left( \frac{M\; W_{Urea}}{M\; W_{NOx}} \right)} & (14) \end{matrix}$

where MW_(Urea) is the molecular weight of urea, and MW_(NOx) is the molecular weight of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream. When the amount of NO in the exhaust gas stream is less than or equal to the amount of NO₂ in the exhaust gas stream, the flow rate of urea can be expressed according to the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{{\overset{.}{m}}_{NOx}}{0.5*\left( \frac{M\; W_{Urea}}{M\; W_{NOx}} \right)\frac{2\left( {a + 1} \right)}{3}} & (15) \end{matrix}$

In some implementations, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 is communicable in data receiving communication with the reductant limiting module 390 to receive a reductant limiting requirement 342 (see FIG. 15). As will be described in more detail below, the reductant limiting requirement 342 includes instructions for increasing or decreasing the reductant injection requirement 332 based on whether one or more reductant limiting conditions are present. Accordingly, the inverse reductant hydrolysis module 334 is operable to modify the reductant injection requirement 332 according to the reductant limiting requirement 342.

Referring to FIG. 10, the NH₃ storage module 350 is operable to determine an ammonia storage modifier or storage compensation command 352. Generally, the ammonia storage modifier 352 includes information regarding the state of ammonia storage on the SCR catalyst 152. More specifically, the ammonia storage modifier 352 includes instructions on whether ammonia entering the SCR catalyst 152 should be increased or decreased, e.g., whether the ammonia addition requirement should be increased or decreased. The ammonia target module 310 is communicable in data receiving communication with the NH₃ storage module 350 to receive the ammonia storage modifier 352 as an input value. Based on the ammonia storage modifier 352, the ammonia target module 310 is operable to adjust, e.g., increase or decrease, the ammonia addition requirement 326 to compensate for modulations in the ammonia storage level on the SCR catalyst 152 and maintain a sufficient amount of stored NH₃ on the SCR catalyst for transient operations of the engine 11.

As discussed above, the performance of the SCR system 150 is defined by the conversion efficiency of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream and the amount of ammonia that has slipped out of the tail-pipe over both steady-state and transient duty cycles. During transient duty cycles, the response of conventional control systems that monitor only the NO_(x) level at the tailpipe outlet typically are limited by the dynamics of the reductant dosing system, the cross-sensitivity of the NO_(x) sensor to NH₃, and other factors. Accordingly, conventional control systems may have unstable feedback controls during transient duty cycles. To improve the response and feedback controls during transient duty cycles, the SCR system 150 utilizes NH₃ stored on the SCR catalyst to manage transient NO_(x) spikes that may occur during transient operation or cycles of the engine 11. Further, NH₃ stored on the SCR catalyst 152 can be used to reduce NO_(x) when engine system operating conditions, such as low SCR catalyst bed temperatures, require a reduction or elimination of reductant dosing. The NH₃ storage module 350 is configured to monitor and regulate the amount of ammonia stored on the SCR catalyst 152 such that a sufficient amount of stored NH₃ is maintained on the SCR catalyst to accommodate transient NO_(x) variations and low catalyst bed temperatures as well as reduce NH₃ slip.

The NH₃ storage module 350 includes a current NH₃ storage level module 354 and a target NH₃ storage level module 356. The modules 354, 356 process one or more inputs received by the NH₃ storage module 350 as will be explained in more detail below. For example, referring to FIG. 11, the current NH₃ storage level module 354 is communicable in data receiving communication with several sensors for receiving data sensed by the sensors. In the illustrated embodiment, the several sensors include at least the SCR catalyst bed temperature sensor 124C, NH₃ sensors 166A-C, and NO_(x) sensors 164A-D. The current NH₃ storage level module 354 also is capable of receiving an AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382 value and a calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399 as will be described in further detail below.

The current NH₃ storage level module 354 also includes an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 358, an NH₃ flux module 364, an SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 366, an SCR catalyst degradation factor module 368, an SCR catalyst NH₃ slip module 369, and an NH₃ desorption module 375. Based on input received from the sensors 124C, 166A, —C, 164A-D, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382 (if an AMOX catalyst is used), the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value 399, and operation of the modules 358, 364, 366, 368, 369, 375, the current NH₃ storage level module 354 is operable to determine the current NH₃ storage level 370 (e.g., an estimate of the current amount of NH₃ stored on the SCR catalyst 152 based at least partially on the SCR catalyst bed temperature), the current NH₃ slip 372 (e.g., an estimate of the current amount of NH₃ exiting the SCR catalyst), and the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 (e.g., an estimate of the maximum amount of NH₃ capable of being stored on the SCR catalyst based under current conditions). The fraction of the available storage on the SCR catalyst that is filled can be determined by dividing the current NH₃ storage level 370 by the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374.

The NO_(x) sensor 164B being embedded within the SCR catalyst 152 provides several advantages over prior art systems. For example, placing the NO_(x) sensor 164B inside the SCR catalyst 152 improves the monitoring of stored ammonia on the catalyst by reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of the NO_(x) sensor. The NO_(x) sensor 164B can be used with other NO_(x) sensors in the exhaust aftertreatment system 100 to quantify the spatial distribution of stored ammonia.

The SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 358 is similar to SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 316 of the ammonia target module 310. For example, the exhaust properties module 358 is operable to determine various properties of the exhaust, such as the temperature and flow rate of the exhaust.

The NH₃ flux module 364 is operable to determine the rate at which NH₃ flows into the SCR catalyst 152. The NH₃ flux module 364 can also process data concerning the amount of NH₃ present at the tailpipe outlet as sensed by the NH₃ sensor 166C. The NH₃ sensor 166C at the tailpipe outlet assists in the measurement and control of the tailpipe NH₃ slip by providing information regarding the tailpipe NH₃ slip to various modules of the controller 130. In some instances, the modules, e.g., the target NH₃ storage level module 356 and the reductant limiting module 390, adjust the urea dosing rate and the ammonia storage targets based at least partially on the tailpipe NH₃ slip information received from the NH₃ sensor.

The SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 366 is similar to the SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 314 of the ammonia target module 310. For example, the SCR catalyst inlet NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 366 is operable to predict the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio of the exhaust gas in the exhaust gas stream according to Equation 1.

The SCR catalyst degradation factor module 368 is operable to determine a degradation factor or condition of the SCR catalyst 152 in a manner the same as or similar to the NO_(x) reduction efficiency module 312 of the ammonia target module 310 described above.

According to one embodiment, the current NH₃ storage level module 354 determines the estimated current NH₃ storage level 370 by utilizing, at least in part, the current condition of the SCR catalyst bed, the size and properties of the SCR catalyst bed, and the ammonia flux entering the SCR catalyst. Referring to FIG. 12, and according to one exemplary embodiment, the NH₃ storage level module 354 utilizes the schematic flow chart 500 to determine the current NH₃ storage level 370 on the SCR catalyst 152. The reductant target module 330 is operable to determine the reductant injection requirement 332, e.g., urea dosing rate, at 510. Alternatively, the current NH₃ storage level module 354 is communicable in data receiving communication with the reductant delivery mechanism 190 for receiving the current reductant dosing rate 383. The SCR catalyst bed temperature sensor 124C senses, or a bed temperature module estimates, the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed temperature at 520.

Based at least partially on the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed as determined at 520, the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 is generated by the current NH₃ storage level module 354 at 530. The NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 is dependent on the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed and can be determined by comparing the SCR catalyst bed temperature against a pre-calibrated look-up table. The urea dosing rate, which corresponds to the ammonia flux entering the SCR catalyst 152, and SCR catalyst bed temperature are used to determine an NH₃ fill-up or adsorption time constant and the SCR catalyst bed temperature and NO_(x) flux are used to determine an NH₃ removal or desorption time constant. The time constants can be retrieved from respective look-up tables 540, 550 stored on, for example, the current NH₃ storage level module 354.

A determination of the SCR catalyst mode is made at 560. Based on whether the SCR catalyst 152 is in an NH₃ fill-up mode or an NH₃ removal mode, the corresponding time constant (τ) is used to calculate the current NH₃ storage level (NH₃Storage) at 570 according to the following first order dynamics equation:

$\begin{matrix} {{{NH}_{3}{Storage}} = {{NH}_{3}{{Storage}_{MAX}\left( \frac{1}{{\tau \; s} + 1} \right)}}} & (16) \end{matrix}$

where NH₃Storage_(MAX) is the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 of the SCR catalyst 152 and s is the complex variable used for Laplace transforms. In other words, if it is determined at 560 that more ammonia should be stored on the SCR catalyst 152, the NH₃ adsorption time constant determined at 540 is used in Equation 16 to determine the current NH₃ storage level 370. Alternatively, if it is determined at 560 that ammonia should be removed from the SCR catalyst 152, the NH₃ desorption time constant determined at 550 is used in Equation 16 to determine the current NH₃ storage level 370. Accordingly, the current NH₃ storage level 370 is at least partially based on the ammonia flux, temperature of the catalyst and degradation of the catalyst.

In at least one embodiment, the storage mode, e.g., fill-up or removal mode, of the SCR catalyst 152 is determined by the NH₃ storage module 350 by comparing the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 with the current NH₃ storage level 370. If the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 is less than the current NH₃ storage level 370 then the SCR catalyst 152 is in the desorption mode. Similarly, if the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 is more than the current NH₃ storage level 370 then the SCR catalyst 152 is in the adsorption mode.

The look-up tables utilized at 540, 550 include a listing of the adsorption and desorption time constants, respectively, corresponding to various possible urea dosing rates and SCR catalyst bed temperatures. In certain implementations, the adsorption time constants can be calibrated using steady-state testing. For example, the engine 11 can be run at specific steady state modes such that the temperature of SCR catalyst bed reaches and is held at a specific temperature corresponding to each mode. Prior to reaching each mode, the SCR catalyst 152 is clean such that the catalyst bed does not contain stored ammonia, i.e., the amount of NO_(x) coming out of the engine is the same as the amount of NO_(x) coming out of the SCR catalyst. For each respective mode, the reductant target module 330 is operable to communicate to the reductant delivery mechanism 190 to inject an amount of reductant necessary to achieve 100% conversion of NO_(x). The amount of reductant can vary for different stoichiometric reactions rates ranging, for example, between about 0.5 to about 2.0. The amount of time between the initial reductant dosing and ammonia slippage from the SCR catalyst 152 is determined for each mode at each stoichiometric reaction dosing rate and used to calibrate the adsorption time constants in the NH₃ fill-up time constant table.

The desorption time constants in the NH₃ removal time constant table can be calibrated during the same test used for calibrating the adsorption time constants. For example, after NH₃ begins to slip from the SCR catalyst 152 as described above, the NH₃ slip and NO_(x) leaving the SCR catalyst are monitored until they stabilize or become constant. Once the NH₃ slip and SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) are stable, the urea dosing is discontinued and the amount of time between discontinuation of urea dosing and the SCR catalyst outlet NO_(x) to equal the engine outlet NO_(x) is determined for each mode at each stoichiometric reaction dosing rate.

If desired, the adsorption and desorption time constants can be further calibrated to compensate for transient operation of the engine 11. For example, the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) measurements of ammonia slip values and the time between the beginning of a transient FTP cycle and slippage from the SCR catalyst can be used to fine-tune the adsorption and desorption time constants. More specifically, the time constants can be adjusted based on a least squares approach that can provide the best first order model fit to the transient data.

The target NH₃ storage level module 356 is operable to determine a target NH₃ storage level based at least in part on the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 determined by the current NH₃ storage level module 354. Generally, the target NH₃ storage level module 356 determines the target NH₃ storage level by multiplying the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 by an ammonia storage level fraction. The ammonia storage level fraction can be any of various fractions, such as fifty percent, seventy-five percent, ninety percent, and one-hundred percent. The ammonia storage level fraction is determined based at least partially on the SCR catalyst degradation factor and user defined maximum allowable ammonia slip.

Once the current NH₃ storage level 370 and the target NH₃ storage level are determined, the NH₃ storage module 350 utilizes the current NH₃ storage level 370 as feedback and compares the current NH₃ storage level and the target NH₃ storage level. If the current NH₃ storage level is less than the target NH₃ storage level, the ammonia storage modifier 352 is set to a positive value. If the current NH₃ storage level 370 is more than the target NH₃ storage level, the ammonia storage modifier 352 is set to a negative value. The positive and negative values can vary depending on how much less or more the current NH₃ storage level 370 is compared to the target NH₃ storage level. The ammonia storage modifier 352 is communicated to the ammonia target module 310 (see FIG. 5). An ammonia storage modifier 352 with a positive value indicates to the ammonia target module 310 that the ammonia addition requirement 326 should be correspondingly increased. In contrast, an ammonia storage modifier 352 with a negative value indicates to the ammonia target module 310 that the ammonia addition requirement 326 should be correspondingly decreased.

The amount of NH₃ storage on the catalyst 152 can be controlled by controlling any of various inputs into the SCR system 150. For example, referring to FIG. 12, the amount of ammonia storage on the SCR catalyst 152 is dependent on the following separately controllable factors: the urea dosing rate, the SCR catalyst bed temperature, and the SCR catalyst maximum capacity. Accordingly, the controller 130 can be operable to selectively or cooperatively control the current NH₃ storage level on the SCR catalyst 152.

The ammonia storage modifier 352 also can be adjusted according to the current NH₃ storage slip 372, the presence or absence of an AMOX catalyst, such as AMOX catalyst 160, and if an AMOX catalyst is used, the conversion capability 382 of the AMOX catalyst.

According to one embodiment, the SCR catalyst ammonia slip module 369 determines the estimated current NH₃ slip 372 from the SCR catalyst 152 by utilizing, at least in part, the ammonia and NO_(x) flux entering the catalyst, the size and properties of the SCR catalyst bed, and the ratio of NO to NO₂. Referring to FIG. 13, and according to one exemplary embodiment, the ammonia slip module 369 utilizes the schematic flow chart 600 to determine the current NH₃ slip 372 from the SCR catalyst 152. The amount of NO_(x) at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152 is determined at 610 and the amount of NO_(x) at the outlet of the SCR catalyst is determined at 614. The NO_(x) inlet amount can be sensed by the NO_(x) sensor 164A and the NO_(x) outlet amount can be sensed by the NO_(x) sensor 164C or NO_(x) sensor 164D. To account for any degradation of the sensor 164D, the output of the NO_(x) sensor 164D can be calibrated as described above in relation to calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397. The ratio of NO to NO₂ in the exhaust gas stream at the inlet of the SCR catalyst 152 is determined at 612 and the ratio of NO to NO₂ in the exhaust gas stream at the outlet of the SCR catalyst is determined at 616. In some implementations, the SCR catalyst NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 366 is operable to determine the NO to NO₂ ratios at the inlet and outlet of the SCR catalyst 152, respectively.

At 620, the amount of ammonia consumed within the SCR catalyst 152 is calculated based on the net loss, e.g., conversion, of NO and NO₂ from the exhaust gas stream. In some implementations, the calculation is performed by the current NH₃ storage level module 354. Based at least partially on the flow of NH₃ into the SCR catalyst 152 determined at 630 and the amount of ammonia consumed within the SCR catalyst 152, the excess amount of NH₃ within the SCR catalyst is estimated at 640. As described above, the amount of NH₃ flowing into the SCR catalyst 152 can be determined by utilizing flow chart 400 of FIG. 10.

Further, based at least partially on the current NH₃ storage level 370 determined at 650, the flow rate of the exhaust gas stream into and through the SCR catalyst 152 determined at 652, and the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed determined at 653, the amount of ammonia desorbed from the bed of the SCR catalyst 152 is estimated at 660. Generally, desorption of ammonia occurs when there is a specific increase in the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed. The amount of temperature increase necessary to effect desorption of ammonia is at least partially dependent on the condition and type of SCR catalyst being used. As shown in FIG. 11, the current NH₃ storage level module 354 can include the desorbed NH₃ module 375, which is operable to estimate the amount of ammonia desorbed from the bed of the SCR catalyst 152. In certain implementations, the NH₃ storage level module 354 estimates the amount of ammonia desorbed from the SCR catalyst bed based on the excess NO_(x) flux available for reduction reaction on the SCR catalyst surface.

Based at least partially on the excess amount of NH₃ within the SCR catalyst 152, the amount of NH₃ desorbed from the SCR catalyst bed, and the amount of NH₃ stored on the SCR catalyst relative to the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374 of the catalyst, i.e., the fraction of the SCR catalyst occupied by stored ammonia, the amount of NH₃ slipping from the SCR catalyst is estimated at 680. The amount of NH₃ slipping from the SCR catalyst 152 is equal to the sum of the excess amount of NH₃ determined at 640 and the desorbed amount of NH₃ determined at 660. The fraction of the SCR catalyst occupied by stored ammonia is determined at 670 by dividing the NH₃ stored on the catalyst as determined at 650 by the NH₃ maximum storage capacity determined, for example, at 530 of flow diagram 500. Generally, if the total amount of NH₃ stored on the SCR catalyst 152 is greater than the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374, i.e., the ammonia stored fraction determined at 670 is greater than one, then ammonia slip from the catalyst is occurring and the amount of slip is determined at 680. If the total amount of NH₃ within the SCR catalyst is less than the NH₃ maximum storage capacity 374, i.e., the ammonia stored fraction is less than one, then ammonia slip is not occurring and the amount of ammonia slip is not calculated at 680. In other words, the analytical model used to compute the ammonia slip at 680 does not become active until the SCR catalyst 152 is full with ammonia, or the SCR catalyst bed temperature and rate of increase of the SCR catalyst bed temperatures are above predetermined thresholds.

The amount of NH₃ slip from the catalyst 152 can be controlled by controlling any of various inputs into the SCR system 150. For example, referring to FIG. 13, the amount of ammonia slip from the SCR catalyst 152 is dependent on the following separately controllable factors: the amount of NH₃ flowing into the SCR catalyst as determined at 630; the exhaust flow rate as determined at 652; and the current NH₃ storage level as determined using flow chart 500. Accordingly, the controller 130 can be operable to selectively or cooperatively control the NH₃ slip from the SCR catalyst.

If the current NH₃ storage slip 372 is relatively high, such as when the temperature of the SCR catalyst bed exceeds a predetermined level, then the NH₃ storage module is operable to decrease the ammonia storage modifier 352. In contrast, if the current NH₃ storage slip 372 is relatively low, then the NH₃ storage module is operable to increase or hold steady the ammonia storage modifier 352.

According to one embodiment shown in FIG. 14, the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 determines an AMOX NH₃ conversion capability or efficiency 382, a tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 and an AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385. Generally, the NH₃ conversion capability 382 represents an estimate of the ability of the AMOX catalyst 160 to convert NH₃ to N₂ and other less harmful or less noxious components. The tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 represents an estimate of the amount of NH₃ exiting the AMOX catalyst 160. As will be described in more detail below, the AMOX thermal mass 385 is a measure of the AMOX catalyst's ability to conduct and store heat.

The AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 receives input regarding the exhaust gas flow rate 700 entering the AMOX catalyst 160 and the amount of NH₃ entering the AMOX catalyst. In some implementations, the exhaust gas flow rate 700 is determined by the SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 358 of current NH₃ storage level module 354 (see FIG. 11) or other similar module. The amount of NH₃ entering the AMOX catalyst 160 can be represented by an NH₃ input 712 and/or the current NH₃ slip 372. More specifically, in some implementations, the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 is communicable in data receiving communication with the current NH₃ storage level module 354 to receive the current NH₃ slip 372. In these implementations, the amount of NH₃ entering the AMOX catalyst 160 can be set to the current NH₃ slip 372. In some implementations, the control system 150 can include an NH₃ sensor between the SCR catalyst 152 and the AMOX catalyst 160. In these implementations, the amount of NH₃ entering the AMOX catalyst 160 can be set to the output of the NH₃ sensor. Alternatively, in certain instances, the amount of NH₃ entering the AMOX catalyst 160 can be set to a combination of the current NH₃ slip 372 and the output of the NH₃ sensor, such as an average of the current NH₃ slip 372 and the output of the NH₃ sensor. The AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 can also be communicable in data receiving communication with various other sensors, such as temperature sensors 124D, 124E and NO_(x) sensor 164C.

The AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 includes several modules including, but not limited to, an AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386, an NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 387, an AMOX catalyst degradation module 388, and a tailpipe NH₃ slip target module 389.

The AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386 is operable to estimate the temperature of the AMOX catalyst bed. In one implementation, the AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386 utilizes the input from the temperature sensors 124D, 124E to determine the difference between the temperature of the exhaust at the inlet of the AMOX catalyst 160 and the temperature of the exhaust at the outlet of the AMOX catalyst. Based at least partially on the temperature differential and mass flow rate properties of the exhaust gas stream, the AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386 calculates the temperature of the AMOX catalyst bed. Alternatively, or in addition to estimating the AMOX catalyst bed temperature as described above, the SCR system 150 can include a temperature sensor (not shown) coupled to the AMOX catalyst 160. The AMOX catalyst bed temperature module 386 can utilize the output of the AMOX catalyst temperature sensor to determine the temperature of the AMOX catalyst bed.

Similar to the SCR catalyst NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 366 of the current NH₃ storage level module 354, the NO₂/NO_(x) ratio module 387 of the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 is operable to determine the ratio of NO₂ to NO_(x) according to Equation 1 above, where NO₂ is the amount of nitrogen dioxide at the inlet of the AMOX catalyst 160 and NO is the amount of nitrogen oxide at the inlet of the AMOX catalyst as sensed by the NO_(x) sensor 164C.

Similar to the SCR catalyst degradation factor module 368 of current NH₃ storage level module 354, the AMOX catalyst degradation module 388 is operable to determine an AMOX catalyst degradation factor indicating the condition of the AMOX catalyst. In certain implementations, the catalyst degradation factor is determined by an algorithm that compares the conversion efficiency of the “aged” AMOX catalyst at predetermined engine operating conditions and urea dosing rates with the conversion efficiency of a “fresh” AMOX catalyst under the same predetermined conditions and dosing rates.

The tailpipe NH₃ slip target module 389 is operable to determine a tailpipe NH₃ slip target, i.e., the desired amount of NH₃ allowed to exit the AMOX catalyst 160. The tailpipe NH₃ slip target is based at least partially on a desired average amount of NH₃ slip from the AMOX catalyst and/or a desired maximum amount of NH₃ slip from the AMOX catalyst. In some instances, both the desired average amount of NH₃ slip from the AMOX catalyst and desired maximum amount of NH₃ slip from the AMOX catalyst are used to ensure that actual tailpipe slip levels remain below a human detectable threshold. Further, the tailpipe NH₃ slip target can be based on other factors, such as current emissions standards and customer-based specifications.

Based at least partially on at least one of the flow rate of exhaust, NO_(x), and ammonia entering the AMOX catalyst 160, the temperature of the AMOX catalyst bed, the ratio of NO₂/NO_(x) at the inlet of the AMOX catalyst, the catalyst degradation factor, and the tailpipe NH₃ slip target, the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 estimates the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382, the tailpipe NH₃ slip 384, and the AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385. For example, in some implementations, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382 and the tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 are dependent on the amount of NO_(x) entering the AMOX catalyst, the temperature of the AMOX catalyst, and a space velocity of the AMOX catalyst. Further, in some instances, the AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385 is based at least partially on the geometric dimensions of the AMOX catalyst, and the material properties of the AMOX catalyst, such as the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of the AMOX catalyst. In some instances, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382, the tailpipe NH₃ slip 384, and the AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385 can be estimated by accessing a multi-dimensional, pre-calibrated look-up table stored on the controller 130.

Generally, the higher the AMOX catalyst conversion capability 382, the more tolerance the SCR system 150 has to NH₃ slipping from the SCR catalyst 152. Accordingly, if the AMOX catalyst conversion capability 382 is relatively high, more NH₃ can be allowed to slip from the SCR catalyst 152. However, with more NH₃ slipping from the SCR catalyst 152, more NH₃ storage sites on the surface of the SCR catalyst 152 may be vacant, thus requiring an increase in the ammonia addition requirement 326. In such an instance, the NH₃ storage module 350 can increase the ammonia storage modifier 352, which in turn can increase the ammonia addition requirement 326. In contrast, when the AMOX catalyst conversion capability 382 is relatively low, less NH₃ slippage from the SCR catalyst 152 is tolerated, resulting in less NH₃ removed from storage on the SCR catalyst. If more NH₃ slips from the SCR catalyst 152 and the AMOX catalyst conversion capability 382 is relatively low, the tailpipe NH₃ slip may correspondingly increase. Therefore, in these instances, the NH₃ storage module 350 can decrease or hold steady the ammonia storage modifier 352 to decrease or hold-steady the ammonia addition requirement 326, and/or the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 can modulate the effectiveness of the AMOX catalyst 160, such that tailpipe NH₃ slip is controlled.

In some implementations, the AMOX catalyst thermal mass value 385 is dependent on the material properties of the AMOX catalyst bed, such as thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity. Generally, the thermal mass 385 is a measure of the AMOX catalyst's ability to conduct and store heat. The AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 can communicate the AMOX catalyst thermal mass value 385 to the NH₃ storage module 350, which can use the thermal mass value in its determination of the ammonia storage modifier 352.

As described above, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability and AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385 is communicated to and processed by various other modules of the controller 130. For example, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382 and AMOX catalyst thermal mass 385 is received by the NH₃ storage module 350 and used to determine the ammonia storage modifier 352 (see FIG. 10). Further, the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382 is used by the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 399 to determine the tailpipe NO_(x) feedback value 399 (see FIG. 16).

The tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 determined by the AMOX embedded analytical model NH₃ conversion module 380 can be communicated to other modules of the controller 130. For example, the determined tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 can be communicated to the reductant limiting module 390 (see FIG. 15) and calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 (see FIG. 16) to replace or supplement the tailpipe NH₃ slip measurement input communicated from the NH₃ sensor 166C. For example, in certain instances, the input value for the tailpipe NH₃ into the modules 390, 397 can be an average of the determined tailpipe NH₃ slip 384 and the tailpipe NH₃ slip measurement from the sensor 166C to provide a more accurate indication of the actual amount of NH₃ slipping from the tailpipe.

Referring to FIG. 15, the reductant limiting module 390 is operable to determine a reductant limiting requirement 342 based at least in part on whether any of various reductant limiting conditions have been met. The reductant limiting module 390 includes a reductant limiting conditions module 394 and an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 395. Generally, the reductant limiting module 390 is operable to either reduce reductant dosing, prevent reductant dosing or leave reductant dosing unchanged when certain predetermined conditions of the exhaust aftertreatment system 100 are met.

The reductant limiting conditions module 394 is operable to monitor the operating conditions of the engine system 10 and determine if one or more reductant limiting conditions are met. In some embodiments, the reductant limiting conditions include, but are not limited to, an exhaust gas temperature limit, an ammonia slip reductant rate limit, and an SCR catalyst bed temperature limit.

Reductant dosing at high exhaust gas temperatures can cause cyanuric acid and polymers (e.g., melamine) to form on the injector and exhaust pipe walls, which can lead to performance degradation of and damage to the system. For example, the formation of melamine can clog the nozzle. To prevent cyanuric acid from forming, the reductant limiting module 390, including the reductant limiting conditions module 394, monitors the exhaust gas temperature and prevents reductant dosing, e.g., via instructions in the reductant limiting requirement 342, if the exhaust gas temperature exceeds a predetermined exhaust gas temperature limit. The current exhaust gas temperature can be sensed by at least one of the temperature sensors, e.g., exhaust temperature sensor 124C and/or predicted by an SCR catalyst inlet exhaust properties module 395 similar to module 358.

Reductant dosing at high SCR catalyst storage levels and SCR catalyst bed temperature ramps can cause ammonia to slip from the SCR catalyst 152. To reduce ammonia slip in these situations, the reductant limiting module 390 monitors the current NH₃ storage level 370 and the modulations of the SCR catalyst bed temperature as sensed by the temperature sensor 124D (or predicted by an SCR catalyst bed temperature module as described above). If the current NH₃ storage level 370 exceeds a predetermined NH₃ storage level associated with NH₃ slip, or if the modulation in SCR catalyst bed temperature exceeds a predetermined SCR catalyst bed temperature change, then the reductant limiting module reduces the reductant dosing rate, e.g., via instructions in the reductant limiting requirement, such that NH₃ slip from the SCR catalyst 152 is controlled.

The reductant limiting module 390 is also operable to prevent reductant dosing in the event a specific component or components of the SCR system 150 has malfunctioned or is otherwise not ready for operation.

Referring to FIG. 16, the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 of the controller 130 is operable to determine the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399. The calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 is communicable in data receiving communication with the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor 164D and tailpipe NH₃ sensor 166C. The calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 is also communicable in data receiving communication with the current NH₃ storage level module 354 to receive the estimated current NH₃ slip 372 or the estimated amount of NH₃ exiting the SCR catalyst 152. Further, the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 is communicable in data receiving communication with the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380 to receive the AMOX NH₃ conversion capability 382. The calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 also includes a sensor degradation module 398 that is operable to determine a tailpipe NO_(x) sensor degradation factor based at least partially on the type of sensor, age of sensor, and operating conditions of the engine system 10. In some instances, the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor degradation factor is determined by an algorithm that compares the NO_(x) sensor measurements at pre-determined operating conditions having known NO_(x) values. The degradation factor indicates an amount, e.g., a percentage, the measured NO_(x) sensor value should be adjusted to account for degradation of the NO_(x) sensor and inaccuracies associated with the degraded NO_(x) sensor measurements. In some implementations, the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value is about 10% higher than the measured tailpipe NO_(x) value.

The calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) module 397 processes the sensed tailpipe NO_(x) amount, the sensed tailpipe NH₃ amount, the estimated NH₃ slip 372, the NO_(x) sensor degradation factor, and the AMOX conversion capability 382 to determine the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399. The calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399 can replace the sensed amount of NO_(x) detected by the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor 164D in the reductant limiting requirement 342 calculation by the reductant limiting module 390 for a more accurate indication of the amount of NO_(x) leaving the tailpipe and a more accurate reductant limiting requirement. Additionally, the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) value 399 can be communicated to and processed by the current NH₃ storage level module 354.

Referring to FIG. 17, and according to one representative embodiment, a method 800 of reducing NO_(x) emissions using ammonia storage on an SCR catalyst is shown. The method 800 starts at 802 and includes determining 804 a NO_(x) reduction requirement. In some implementations, determining 804 a NO_(x) reduction requirement includes operating the NO_(x) reduction target module 300 to estimate the NO_(x) reduction requirement 304. The method 800 also includes determining 806 an ammonia addition requirement. In some implementations, determining 806 an ammonia addition requirement includes operating the ammonia target module 310 to estimate the ammonia addition requirement 326. The method 800 further includes determining 808 an ammonia storage modifier. In some implementations, determining 808 an ammonia storage modifier includes operating the NH₃ storage module 350 to estimate the ammonia storage modifier 352.

After an ammonia storage modifier is determined, the method 800 includes comparing 810 the ammonia storage modifier to a predetermined value, such as zero. If the ammonia storage modifier is greater than or less than the predetermined value, then the method 800 includes adjusting 812, such as by adding, the ammonia addition requirement determined at 808 by an amount corresponding to the ammonia storage modifier amount. If the ammonia storage modifier is approximately equal to the predetermined value, then the ammonia addition requirement determined at 808 is not adjusted. The method 800 includes determining 814 a reductant injection requirement 814 based on either the ammonia addition requirement determined at 808 or the adjusted addition requirement determined at 812. In some implementations, determining 814 a reductant injection requirement includes operating the reductant target module 330 to calculate the reduction injection requirement 332. The method 800 can also include determining 815 an AMOX catalyst NH₃ conversion capability 382 by operation of the AMOX NH₃ conversion module 380.

The method 800 further includes determining 816 a reductant limiting. In some implementations, determining 816 a reductant limiting includes operating the reductant limiting module 390 to calculate the reductant limiting requirement 342. After a reductant limiting is determined, the method 800 includes comparing 820 the reductant limiting to a predetermined value, such as zero. If the reductant limiting is greater than or less than the predetermined value, then the method 800 includes adjusting 822 the reductant injection requirement determined at 816 by an amount corresponding to the reductant limiting amount. If the reductant limiting is approximately equal to the predetermined value, then the reductant injection requirement determined at 808 is not adjusted. The method includes injecting 824 an amount of reductant corresponding to the reductant injection requirement determined at either 816 or 822 into the exhaust gas stream.

The schematic flow chart diagrams and method schematic diagrams described above are generally set forth as logical flow chart diagrams. As such, the depicted order and labeled steps are indicative of representative embodiments. Other steps and methods may be conceived that are equivalent in function, logic, or effect to one or more steps, or portions thereof, of the methods illustrated in the schematic diagrams. Additionally, the format and symbols employed are provided to explain the logical steps of the schematic diagrams and are understood not to limit the scope of the methods illustrated by the diagrams. Although various arrow types and line types may be employed in the schematic diagrams, they are understood not to limit the scope of the corresponding methods. Indeed, some arrows or other connectors may be used to indicate only the logical flow of a method. For instance, an arrow may indicate a waiting or monitoring period of unspecified duration between enumerated steps of a depicted method. Additionally, the order in which a particular method occurs may or may not strictly adhere to the order of the corresponding steps shown.

The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope. 

1. An apparatus for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust gas stream of an: engine system, comprising: a NO_(x) reduction target module configured to determine a NO_(x) reduction requirement, the NO_(x) reduction requirement comprising an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst; a tailpipe NO_(x) module configured to determine a sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; a signal correction algorithm module configured to determine a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system based at least partially on the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; a feedback ammonia target module configured to determine a feedback ammonia addition requirement, the feedback ammonia addition requirement comprising an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement, wherein the feedback ammonia addition requirement is based at least partially on the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; and a reductant target module configured to determine a reductant injection requirement, the reductant injection requirement comprising an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the feedback ammonia addition requirement.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the signal correction algorithm comprises an ammonia correction feature; and the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system is a function of the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system, an amount of ammonia exiting the engine system, and an ammonia correction factor.
 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system is equal to the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system minus the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system times the ammonia correction factor.
 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system is predicted based upon an analytical model.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the corrected amount of NOx exiting the engine system is determined at least partially by dithering to adjust an ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.
 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein: the tailpipe NO_(x) module is configured to determine a predicted mount of NOx exiting the system based at least partially on an analytical model; and dithering comprises comparing the sensed amount of NOx exiting the engine system with the predicted amount of NOx exiting the system and adjusting the ammonia correction factor accordingly.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, the apparatus further comprising a feedforward ammonia target module configured to determine a feedforward ammonia addition requirement, wherein the reductant injection requirement comprises an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve a combination of the feedback and feedforward ammonia addition requirements.
 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the feedback ammonia addition requirement is based at least partially on a comparison between a desired amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system and the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system.
 9. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising a calibrated NO_(x) module configured to determine a calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) sensor signal based at least partially on input from a tailpipe NO_(x) sensor and the condition of the tailpipe NO_(x) sensor, wherein the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system is determined by the signal correction algorithm module based at least partially on the calibrated tailpipe NO_(x) sensor signal.
 10. A method for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust gas stream of an engine system, the method comprising the steps of: determining a NO_(x) reduction requirement, the NO_(x) reduction requirement comprising an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst; determining a feedback ammonia addition requirement, the feedback ammonia addition requirement comprising an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement in response to a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; determining the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; and determining a reductant injection requirement, the reductant injection requirement comprising an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the feedback ammonia addition requirement.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of determining the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system comprises applying an ammonia correction factor to the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system to compensate for ammonia cross-sensitivity of a sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system is equal to the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system minus the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system times the ammonia correction factor.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of determining the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system comprises performing dithering to adjust an ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein dithering comprises comparing the sensed amount of NOx exiting the engine system with a predicted amount of NOx exiting the system based at least partially on an analytical model and adjusting the ammonia correction factor accordingly.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the feedback ammonia addition requirement comprises comparing a desired amount of NO_(x) emissions exiting the engine system with the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system.
 16. A system for reducing NO_(x) emissions in an engine exhaust, the system comprising: an internal combustion engine producing an exhaust gas stream; a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst that reduces NO_(x) emissions in the exhaust gas stream in the presence of a reductant; a reductant injector that injects reductant into the exhaust gas stream upstream of the SCR catalyst; a tailpipe NO_(x) sensor configured to determine a sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; and a controller comprising: a NO_(x) reduction target module configured to determine a NO_(x) reduction requirement, the NO_(x) reduction requirement comprising an amount of NO_(x) in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on the SCR catalyst; a signal correction algorithm module configured to determine a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system based at least partially on the sensed amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; a feedback ammonia target module configured to determine a feedback ammonia addition requirement, the feedback ammonia addition requirement comprising an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NO_(x) reduction requirement in response to a corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system; and a reductant target module configured to determine a reductant injection requirement, the reductant injection requirement comprising an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the feedback ammonia addition requirement.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the signal correction algorithm module comprises an ammonia correction factor applied to the amount of ammonia exiting the engine system to compensate for ammonia cross-sensitivity of a measured amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system so as to yield the corrected amount of NO_(x) exiting the engine system.
 18. The system of claim 16, wherein dithering is applied by the signal correction algorithm module to adjust an ammonia correction factor so as to reduce transient error.
 19. The system of claim 16, further comprising a NO_(x) sensor embedded within the SCR catalyst.
 20. A method for extracting a tailpipe NO_(x) measurement from a tailpipe NO_(x) signal transmitted from a tailpipe NO_(x) sensor having an ammonia cross-sensitivity, the method comprising the steps of: determining an amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe; adjusting an ammonia correction factor periodically by dithering the amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe; multiplying the amount of ammonia slipping from the tailpipe by the ammonia correction factor to yield a product term; and subtracting the product term from the tailpipe NO_(x) signal to extract the tailpipe NO_(x) measurement. 